Let's change how we use hemp!

 


The world we live in is in trouble, without the changes necessary to reduce CO2 emissions and reduce greenhouse gases, I believe we will not survive another one hundred years. We look for ways to improve what we have come to know and make the advancements necessary to work towards a greener future. Industrial hemp is not a new product, but a misunderstood one, and with the help of the government we can change this misconception. We can take this chance in our history to take from the example of other countries and see the potential this plant could offer to our economy. We need to make changes, we need cleaner solutions, and we need the ability to study and research ways to not only improve our way of life, but the way we live it. I believe that if the understanding of the benefits, potential, and possible profit of this plant the opinion could be changed. By expanding our use of industrial hemp in Michigan we can find hemp to be even more profitable than it is currently. With this Michigan could not only benefit from the economically rewarding plant, but this could contribute to our country as well.

What if you could add a product to our economy that could be very financially rewarding? Currently in Michigan hemp is predominantly grown for CBD production, leaving it to follow strict and expensive guidelines for testing to ensure it stays below the allowed percentage. Our world is changing, and with the changes we need cleaner alternatives to products that we use today. Why continue to import a product that we can grow ourselves, especially if we make it easier for the average farmer to add into their crop rotation? With that I want to speak to you about this product, its benefits, and what this plant can do for farmers. With your help, we can make this happen and save our not only Michigan farms, but potentially farmers across the country.

Industrial hemp is a plant that can make a difference in many ways, as well as significantly boost our economy in the process. Aside from the thousands of products that can be made from the plant, the financial gain to our farmer could help save some of our beloved family farms. Our economy needs something that will help bring our states back to where they need to be financially, along with the people within them. Other countries have recognized this and have profited off this trillion-dollar crop, and we spend millions importing it into the states. I want to take the time to go over just a few beneficial uses of hemp, and express why I believe we need to work to utilize it more than we do currently  

I believe that hemp can be very beneficial to our farmers, because not only is this plant more financially rewarding, it also is very beneficial when added in crop rotations. Some studies suggest that by adding a rotation of hemp to your crops it can not only improve soil health, but also reduce pests in the field. The biomass is greater in a hemp field, therefor we are not only benefiting our fields, but we are also getting more out of them. The common misconception is the THC levels in hemp, which is less than 0-.3% which would not be enough to create psychoactive effects. With that, I feel that the positives of this plant outweigh the negatives, and this plant really should be given a second look as a crop for farmers. With a variety of edible hemp products such as flowers and milk the nutritional value of the plant is amazing, and we could see an expansion in current and potential new markets as well.

Before hemp was banned, this product produced durable dependable textiles for thousands of years. Hemp not only produces more per yield than cotton, it also requires less water, pesticides, and is more durable over time. While Michigan may not be a cotton state, the ability to produce a plant that will contribute to the textile industry would bring a new product that would contribute to the economy and goods produced in our state. Hemp fibers can make a variety of different textiles that makes it an extremely beneficial durable product. Hemp textiles is only a fraction of what this plant has to offer but could be very economically beneficial. We use hemp textiles in the U.S but majority is still imported, we spend more importing than what we would spend to produce.

The common home has a variety of possible risks, the one I would like to point out is mold. From drywall to insulation, if any of these pieces in our home become wet, it becomes molded. The worst part is when we can’t see the hidden dangers in our walls. An increase in health-related issues due to mold and poor air circulation in homes has been a concern, and some builders have been using new methods for a cleaner option. Hemp can be used to make a product that is fireproof, breathable, durable, retains thermal mass, and mold resistant. In recent years we have seen many homes being built from hempcrete, and the health benefits from living in the eco-friendly structures are amazing. Currently we are importing majority of hemp used in hempcrete from the U.K making it a very expensive product. By producing more of these plants in our states, we reduce the cost of importing, as well as give people a possibly safer option to standard drywall and insulation at a more affordable price. Many people have been turning to the option of hempcrete, but as I stated the price from importing can make it a very costly build.

Hemp burns cleaner than traditional gas, as well as does not contribute to acid rain. With more biomass than corn, hemp could be our next solution to fuel while also being a cleaner option. If we legalize the growth and production of hemp, we could further research on the possibilities of what this plant could offer in the fuel industry and be a safer alternative to what we currently use today. Henry Ford made a car that ran off hemp fuel, and with our technology today I believe that we can not only improve this method, but possibly master it. As we understand that we need a safer alternative to fossil fuels and while more research would be needed, this I believe could be a large leap into the right direction.

Hemp has a large variety of useable dependable alternatives to products that we use today, and the benefits are extremely high. These products we use in the states but importing makes the cost of any of these products much higher. Car manufactures have been using hemp in car production, we can make paper, and biodegradable plastics. More research and advancements would need to be performed, but we can take note from other countries that have already been benefiting from what this plant has to offer. Looking for ways to help our economy has always been a concern but expanding the use of this product to our states could open new jobs, and businesses. Other states have worked towards legalizing industrial hemp, and there are manufactures that have the equipment to prosses the plant. While Michigan has allowed the legalization of medicinal marijuana, and more recently hemp I feel we should expand how we use and view this plants potential. Our farmers could benefit from the production and growth of this crop, and for some farmers this might be the boost they need to keep their farms.

I want to thank you for your time, and hope that the information that I have provided you with today can help you see the benefits of hemp. This plant could benefit our economy, and be a cleaner, healthier alternative to the products we currently use today. Without the help of government officials and educating others about the benefits and uses of this plant it will be hard to move forward. But we need change. With your help, I believe that we could work to change how this plant is viewed and work on ways to advance the uses of it. I hope you have enjoyed what I have shared with you today and follow for more Canna Girl Perspective!


Zero Carbon Home: The Art of the Earthship

 

What if you could build a home that could completely sustain itself? The question then becomes why wouldn’t you? Homes today while have come a long way could in fact be causing some of the health issues that we have come to know such as asthma, and respiratory infections. Mold as well as poor air quality has always been a homeowners concern, therefor we invest in expensive systems to purify the air in our homes. But what if you could completely change the way you see a traditional home and in result could have a home that would be sustainable, healthier, low cost, and practically run itself. We are in a point in time where everything that we do affects the quality of life not only for us, but for future generations. With that I would like to introduce you to a concept from an American architect Michael Reynolds and his amazing idea for zero carbon living with is creation of the Earthship.

            To give a brief description of Reynolds, as well as where his idea for the earthship came from, he graduated from the University of Cincinnati in 1969, his passion and inspiration for the earthship was born. In 1971 his thesis was published in the Architectural Record followed by the construction of his first concept of the earth ship. An earthship is a structure that uses passive solar energy and is made of both natural and recycled materials. He has worked with a trial-and-error perspective on his design and found ways to improve his idea, as well as increasing the sustainability of the home. His idea was to create a home that was comfortable, while also having the ability to be completely self-sustainable. His concept has been so successful that this method is used all over the world, and in developing nations is and can be a new way of life. While not all designs are extravagant, the possibilities are truly endless.

            We live in a world littered with garbage, and materials that take thousands of years to decompose. With this, the earthship not only reduces a person’s carbon output but also takes
materials that otherwise would take up space in landfills to make a structure that you could call home. Recycled cans, plastic bottles, glass bottles, tires, and salvaged metals are all used to construct the structure and in a lot of cases can make up seventy percent of materials used in building the structure. Earth rammed tires are the backwall and building bricks of the home, as well as cans and bottles to help for stability as well as glass bottle walls for natural lighting. The possibilities are almost endless. This alone brings down the cost of other necessities you may need that are not from recycled materials. Reynolds refers to it as an art because it truly is even with the use of recycled materials the homes that can be made are spectacular.

The earth ship has several aspects about the home that make it a sustainable structure and I can start with thermal mass. The earthship is just that, it is built into the earth. Earthships are south facing structures that absorb the suns energy to power the home like a battery and uses some of the best aspects of passive solar energy. This gives the home the advantage of using the earth to maintain temperatures, as well as lessoning the exposure to the elements. During construction the earth removed is piled directly behind where the home will be located to create a berm. Long tubes run through the berm that lead to the inside of the home as well as a thermal wrap that goes on the base of the building. This along with windows strategically placed in the front of the structure create not only natural air flow, but also warming or cooling the air as it passes through the tubes. This eliminates the need for traditional heating and cooling because the home naturally controls the temperatures of the earthship in extreme heat and or cold weather. The walls are made from earth materials or “cob” as well as glass or plastic bottles for natural sunlight. Some structures leave space above the room walls for open ventilation, but walls are tall enough for privacy or room separation. The option to add something like a thermal mass heater such as a rocket stove is always an option but is not necessary.

The next aspect of the earthship is the water collection and sewerage containment. Water in some areas is scarce, so having the ability to collect water and utilize it to benefit as best it can is essential. The earthship is designed to have large cisterns for water collection of rain or snow. The homes system has pump panels that filter and pump the water through the home and pressurize it, but in order to be sustainable the plumbing while meets codes is not quite the same. An earthship uses its water four times before it finally leaves the system therefor taking the max benefit and wasting less. The system treats from within the home through contained sewage treatment planters called botanical cells. From the filters the first stop would be for uses such as sink water, shower water, and possibly the water to wash your clothes. After the first use of the collected water then it is recirculated through solar pumps to bring the water to the next stage of the system. At this point the water is grey water and is directed through rubber lined planters that grow plants in the front of the home in the greenhouse portion of the structure. The plant roots oxygenate the water cleaning it and when the water reaches the last botanical cell it is then circulated to the toilet tanks for flushing. From the toilets we now have black water that is directed to a septic tank. The last stop of the water is the outside plants in the landscaping. The water overflow from the septic tank flows into the final botanical cell feeding the outdoor landscapes, preserving fresh water from needing to be used.

The next aspect of the home which I briefly mentioned is the interior garden. With the energy from the sun the front of the home is designed as a garden. This does a few things for the home the first being food production. With the use of thermal mass of the home, this helps create the perfect temperatures for a very large variety of plants for consumption. One of the most fascinating plants I believe is the ability to grow a banana tree because they are an imported fruit. Having the ability to grow food that normally you would need shipped in drastically reduces the carbon footprint. With the use of circulating the water threw the home this also creates a self-watering garden that can produce food in the home all year round. Some of Reynolds designs also feature the use of fish and small ponds incorporated into the system that also contribute to food production, but similarly the filtration of the system and fertilization of the plants. I see the fish adding a aquaponic aspect to the system which only increases its sustainability. 

With a home comes energy use. According to the U.S Energy Information Administration, in 2016 emissions of carbon dioxide by the US electric power sector were 1,821 million metric tons, or about 35% of the total energy related carbon dioxide emissions of 5,171 million metric tons. An earthship is powered by solar and in some cases wind power as well. While some systems are able to be completely off grid, Reynolds says the average utility bill for a earthship that is connected to the grid is one hundred dollars a year. Because of the use of passive solar energy, the home does not require the same amount of energy as an average home. You are still able to have every amenity of a traditional home, with the exception that you could have an earthship sustainable to the point where you really wouldn’t have to leave. There is not a need for a furnace like in a traditional home, as well as the ability to use solar water heaters to reduce energy use. Depending on the type of area you are located in there are different design’s that cater to many different climates, conditions, and location.

The construction of the home is very intricate and, in some cases, specific to help create the right circulation flow for the home. There are different methods to accommodate for things such as climates and moisture levels to make sure your home can be as efficient as possible. While all the benefits of the structure are amazing, it comes at the cost of labor. The build of an earthship is very labor intensive, and without volunteers or lots of time and work could be costly on labor. With that said though, the earthship movement is large and people seem to want to help, teach, and learn the technique. Reynolds offers tours of sample homes as well as classes for biotecture and the art of building earthships. Some of the estimates that I found to have someone build one of these homes for you would cost around twenty-two dollars a square foot but building it yourself or with a group of people as I said could cut that cost drastically. Upon my reading over the years of researching this home, I found that the best way to get help is to give it first. With the different designs and possibilities for the structure of the home, getting a hands-on experience could help you make good choices when thinking about your own build. In turn, you can meet a network of people to call upon when you are ready for your own build.

While the idea is not at traditional as the modern homes today, the idea behind it can truly make an impact. In a world filled with materials that unfortunately are here to stay, why continue to make new products to build instead of using what we have created for something else and repurpose it for longevity. As I said before the earthship works just like a battery, and charges just like one. The first year to two years the earth walls can still be drying and not retain as much thermal mass, but once the walls have dried the home is a continuous self-sustaining machine.

In conclusion, I believe that in the world we live in today that an idea such as this could really change our output. While understanding that corporations may not agree in a movement such as this, the overall positive effect it could have, may save future generations. Earthships don’t have to look like mud shacks by any means, so the idea and perspective that this is an art should help the idea become prevalent in our future. As we continue to see how our impact on our environment is changing the world we live in, we must make a change to secure the future. The earthship can be two to even a three-story structure, therefor the want for larger buildings is possible but will take more time and work. You can fine earthships for sale ranging from $250,000 and up, depending on size, location, and amenities. With sustainability, next to no utility bill, food production, natural heating, and cooling what more could your really ask for in a home. This idea could not only change minds, but possibly find a way to reuse the waste we have created.


 

Bibliography

LAMBERT, HALLIE. Will Earthships save the Earth? 26 June 2008. 22 February 2018.

Miller, Andrew and Kenneth IP. "Thermal behaviour of an earthsheltered autonomous building- The Brighton Earthship." Renewable Energy 34.9 (2009): 2037-2043.

Purdy, Elizabeth R. Earthship Architecture. n.d. 23 February 2018.

Reynolds, Michael. www.earthshipglobal.com. n.d. 22 February 2018.

TEDxTamaya - Michael Reynolds . Perf. Michael Reynolds. 2009. Youtube.

Vyas, Khushboo. Earthship Homes. 2016. 22 February 2018.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Mike Reynolds. n.d. 23 February 2018.

 

 

Balancing Life!

 

The balance in life sometimes can be difficult even with our best efforts. As a single parent I have experienced this struggle even more after COVID. I lost my previous employment and struggled to find my footing especially before classes began again. While I still haven’t found solid ground, I’m working on it. I work on a farm property currently part time, but also job hunt during the week looking for more opportunities. My hope is my hard work will pay off soon, and I will have the chance to enjoy what I do and those I work with. During this I want to work to finish my pursuit of my education to also benefit me in my future career. I want to be a good example as a single mom that even though we struggle we can still succeed in life, as long as we keep trying! 


If you click on the picture, you can see my video Because I Try for my daughter that even though we face struggles, it's our effort that matters in the end


My Evaluation of the US Farm Bills

 So recently I did a research paper for my take on the history of US farm bills and how they affect the agriculture industry. This i think gives a different perspective especially for me of how much these have changed since they started. 

The United States Farm Bill

My favorite quote I heard many years ago is one that we as consumers should always remember “without a farmer you would be naked, hungry, and sober”. With that thought we would think that the importance of the farmers and the land we have to produce food on would be valued, right? Agriculture has changed many times since people first started farming around 9500 BC, and as we can see in history even though the farmer is such an important roll in society, they have not always been valued as such. While we are very different from farmers of the past, we still see struggles for farmers and continue to make changes. Unfortunately, even with struggles in history we still see an issue with poor choices we even make today. This leads to the current practices and asking, what do we have in place to protect farmers now, and with policies in place who is benefitting?

United states farmers have faced many ups and downs in agriculture since the early 1900’s. In 1920 it was reported that we had 6.5 million farms in the US (Berkman 2020) and in the early twenty’s prices were good and farmers managed well and provided to consumers. An issue that some farmers faced, was when farms took out large loans to buy neighboring parcels with the intent to expand, but then faced price drops in the market. At that time farmers did go to congress to ask for help, but nothing was put in place to give relieve to the farmers. Some farms were forced to sell while others were able to stay afloat. We then faced the Great Depression in 1929. While we had buyouts that happened in the early 1920’s, some farmers in 1929 then faced hardship and could not make payments on the loans they had taken out. Prices dropped, land lost value, decreased prices of land and farmers lost farms to the banks (Walbert n.d.). If the farmers and country wasn’t struggling enough, in the 1930’s farms suffered from the infamous Dust Bowl also referred to as “The Dry Thirties”.

In the 1930’s we started to see a lot of changes especially once the Dust Bowl began in 1931. The Dust Bowl lasted nearly a decade and the effect had serious effects on the environment as well as the economy (Editors 2009). The dust bowl was a result of a mixture of poor farming economics, weather changes, federal land policies, and farming on the great planes. The Dust Bowl caused drought, loss of crops, livestock, as well as death of people in effected areas. The winds ripped topsoil from the land Which contributed to the “Black Blizzard” in 1934 which brough the topsoil that was ripped from the Great plains formed as a thick cloud that reached all the way to New York. The dust clouds caused issues with dust pneumonia which killed several hundreds to thousands of people around that time. On April 14th, 1935, a thick cloud started in Oklahoma and stretched east carrying over three million tons of topsoil from the Great Plains. This was the worst of all large traveling storms and was referred to as “Black Sunday” (Editors 2009).

Farmers faced many struggles in the 1930’s and during that time we began to see several laws and acts put into place because of the financial and environmental struggles we were facing. With that we started to see some changes and things put in place to try to offset the effects we were seeing during this economic crisis with programs that were created under The New Deal. In 1933 the Commodity Credit Corporation also known as the CCC was created as an attempt to create relief for farmers. This program was interesting to me, but it contributed to other programs being added. The CCC offered risk free 12-month loans for selling their crop for profit, if the market price increased for the crops the farmer would pay off the loan, if the market dropped below a fixed price the farmer would then give the crop to the CCC and they would then deal with the storage issue. The same year the Agriculture Adjustment Administration the AAA was an act that was put in place that contributed to creating fixed prices in the market to increase prices, but also offered some of the first subsidies to farmers for replacing sections of their land from cash crops to grasses for soil conservation. This had positive and negative effect to the market between farmers and consumers. While on one hand it financially benefited the farmers, on the other it increased the prices to the financially stricken consumers by decreasing the supply of certain goods available in the market. In 1933 President Roosevelt signed the Agriculture Adjustment Act that’s intent was to help create emergency relief to lower prices of crops to help lesson the burden on consumers during the Great Depression. The drawback of this act was the increased limitations it created in the market for the production of some of the agricultural crops (Wikipedia, United States farm bill 2022). During this time, we also saw the formation of the Farm Credit Administration or the FCA which between 1934 and 1935 worked with farmers to help decrease current interest rates they were carrying. These programs were the governments first attempts to assist in economic welfare, but also was the first step towards the increase in federal authority we could see during the Great Depression. The Agriculture Adjustment Act was deemed unconstitutional because of the way it obtained the money needed for the subsidies. When the act was first put in place in 1933 the money was from an exclusive tax that was placed on companies that processed agricultural products. The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 changed the policy that the funding would be provided by the federal government and not from a tax to processors (wikipedia n.d.)

While we have seen many changes in the agriculture industry, we also can see over several years many bills and laws that have changed or been put in place that can affect a farmer in many ways. While the hope we had would be to preserve family farms, the push over almost 100 years and the commercialization of agriculture has had its effects. In the mid 1930’s we had an estimated 7 million farms in the United States, today we have just over 2 million. With decreased support to family farms, it can make younger generations discouraged from carrying on the family’s legacy, because of this the agriculture industry has seen a decrease in interest as career choice. With this we can suspect to see a slow staggering effect as current students are our future teachers. This unfortunately will only encourage more corporate farming and large-scale operations to make up the difference which we only hope wont have negative impacts.  Since the 1930’s the US farm bills are revised around every five years, and changes are made depending on current economic needs as seen by the government. While the question of who benefits is debatable, what we have seen a growing trend in is an increase in commercialized farming. This then really makes you ask yourself if these programs we currently have in place are benefiting those that may need it the most. Fast forward to the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 or Freedom to Farm Act, this changed policies allowing more flexibility with government loans over a 7-year period but were fixed with no reflection on the current market process and production. With this they also promised to increase exports but asked farmers to agree to lower government subsidies. This act over time was also considered the “Freedom to Fail” act by some. This farm bill we could see good and bad contributions to farmers and many changes that were made regarding qualifications, and repayments based on commodities percentages (wikipedia.org n.d.). Looking back at several of the bills and programs that came after the first in 1933, has slowly pushed farmers to be dependent on the government for help with not as much regulation on large corporate farms slowly pushing farmers out of the picture. The bill in 1996 excludes production of some fruits and vegetables, as well as other facets of the agriculture industry resulting in only helping some of the struggling farms and helping larger operations more.

Another hot topic that is included in a lot of the farm bills that we have seen passed is with the inclusion of food stamp benefits for the low income. We can consider Farm Bills as food bills especially because of the inclusion of food stamps for those who need them. The first food stamp program was established in 1939 and ran until 1943 with a peak participation of 4 million Americans. These were orange and blue stamps that were worth fifty cents for blue ones and a dollar for an orange for equal value of food they may buy with cash. It wasn’t until 1960 when Kennedy witnessed the effects poverty had on family's especially with food security and saw the importance in bringing back the food stamp program. In 1961 a pilot program was created to bring them back, and in 1964 was signed into law by President Johnson. While the program then you had to pay for the food stamps which is different from how the program is now, this put food stamps in a position to be included into farm bills that are passed (USDA 2018). While we have seen many times actions taken to try to take this important program away, this alone can be a reason to call farm bills Food Bills.

Looking at the last two farm bill acts we had in 2014 and 2018 we saw changes on many levels. The Agricultural Act of 2014 added new options for farmers for crop insurance, new conservation programs, as well as many modifications to the food stamp program. Between the last two farm bills that we have had passed I found many to find more positives and changes in the 2014 farm act than the 2018. The Agricultural Act of 2014 increased programs for specialty crops, bioenergy, and organic farming (wikipedia.org, Agricultural Act of 2014 n.d.). Unfortunately, the 2018 United States Farm Bill Act many do not agree with, and programs that were set to expire from the 2014 Act were not restarted. The most recent farm bill is debatably not in favor to farmers, but then they question is what kind of farmer benefits. The changes from a family farm perspective can also be dependent on how large that farm is. Some of the changes I found were very generous for those making almost a million dollars a year, now included as eligible to subsidies when before was not allowed for such a high-income bracket. To a very large dominating farmer this may seem very ideal, but for smaller competing farms this encourages an unfair market advantage. Another notable thing I found about the most recent bill was the lack of requirement of in person management of a farm that is eligible for subsidies. An article from taxpayer.net considered these two out of 10 worst provisions in the newest farm bill. They also called the new income limits if you can call them limits, provisions that have “Ruined over 30 years of common-sense limits to subsidy progress” (taxpayer.net 2018). This last bill while did give more to new farmers and hobbyists, those who have been slowly losing family farms are feeling left behind. Dairy farmers were affected by the changes as well from commodity programs coming to an end and being now converted to law. The Margin Protection Program MPP was replaced with Dairy Margin Coverage DMC which we then saw a domino effect of Michigan dairy farms slowly leaving and being replaced by much larger operations.

While on paper some of the laws may seem favorable to help the farmers, but over time I feel we have seen an increased push in a direction of commercial farming. Farmers can be limited on qualifying factors for insurance, subsidies, and other programs if they are willing to work under contracts and grow what you are told to. While at some points we saw more flexibility, we can push to decrease some of these current limitations especially to small scale farmers. The ability to enter a market independently is extremely challenging, and a farmer can get stonewalled at several turns. Increasing laws, rules, and regulations can limit a small farmer in many ways such as processing issues because of USDA requirements, requirements for sale of meat and other agricultural products. Because of this we have seen the push for contract farmers, complete vertical integration from an outside company leaving no flexibility to the farmer. While we have seen the importance of tracking from farm to table, the abilities of access to smaller farmers should be equal to large corporations. Without equal opportunity of small farmers compared to large scale companies we will see small farms slowly decrease over time. This I feel dramatically decreases food diversity options when commercial operations grow mass amounts of the same product. The unsustainability factor should be considered as we continue to move in such a direction. Diversification of the food options we have available is important, not only from a small business aspect, but also from a growing aspect as well. If we limit the varieties of what we grow we will see in increase with issues such as pests and disease. As we have come to see the negative effects of the use of many pesticides, and herbicides we previously used and their negative effects we should push for more change.

In conclusion, over the years we have seen many programs such as crop insurance and other programs, but if you research into some of the history of who founded them and where they came from, we can slowly begin to see some of the potential issues. We can see the worry with growing corporate America and the owner anonymity which can create unseen market dominance dictated by corporations with private shareholders. These growing issues we have seen in the agriculture industry I feel can reflect such issues, and unfortunately things like farm bills can be the only thing that can change or protect current policies and practices. While we can assume the original purpose of farm bills was to protect food security and help farmers, we must see how policies have changed over time and how farmers have been affected. We as consumers and a society need to be more vigilant and observant of changes like these to ensure we are moving towards a productive and sustainable future. Change in policies to help support smaller farmers, market options and opportunities, as well as more access to subsidies and programs to encourage organics farm diversification, and land preservation. These are things needed if we want to not only help the last of our family farms, but also the future of agriculture in the US.

 

Works Cited

Berkman, Seth. 2020. "How farming has changed in every state the last 100 years." Stacker. September 3. Accessed january 2022. https://stacker.com/stories/3989/how-farming-has-changed-every-state-last-100-years#:~:text=While%20American%20farming%20has%20certainly,come%20in%20at%20two%20million.

Editors, History.com. 2009. "Dust Bowl." History.com. October 27. Accessed 2022. https://www.history.com/topics/great-depression/dust-bowl#:~:text=The%20Dust%20Bowl%20was%20the,failed%20across%20the%20entire%20region.

taxpayer.net. 2018. "Top 10 Worst Provisions in the 2018 Farm Bill." taxpayer.net. December 11. Accessed 2022. https://www.taxpayer.net/agriculture/top-10-worst-provisions-in-the-2018-farm-bill/.

USDA. 2018. "A Short History of SNAP." usda.gov. 9 11. Accessed 2022. https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/short-history-snap.

Walbert, David. n.d. The Depression for Farmers. Accessed 2022. https://www.ncpedia.org/anchor/depression-farmers.

wikipedia. n.d. "Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938." wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_Adjustment_Act_of_1938.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. na. "History of agriculture." Wikipedia. Accessed 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_agriculture#:~:text=It%20was%20not%20until%20after%209500%20BC%20that,peas%2C%20lentils%2C%20bitter%20vetch%2C%20chick%20peas%20and%20flax.

—. 2022. "United States farm bill." .wikipedia.org. Accessed January 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_farm_bill.

wikipedia.org. n.d. "2018 United States farm bill." wikipedia.org. Accessed 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_farm_bill.

—. n.d. "Agricultural Act of 2014." wikipedia.org. Accessed 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_Act_of_2014.

—. n.d. "Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996." wikipedia.org. Accessed 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Agriculture_Improvement_and_Reform_Act_of_1996.

 

 

 


Green Energy Thoughts

 

    For the past several years I have had a passion for green energy as well as the use of industrial hemp in more industries. When first diving into the world of agriculture I had assumed that the information must have been lacking, but later found with more research that in the United States it just wasn’t being utilized. On my path for more information, I found even more beneficial green options that even though we have the tools, we just haven’t pushed for the change and to put it into place. At heart I am a green energy nerd and feel that if more people were aware of changes we could make, then maybe the motivation would proceed.

    I would love to use this platform to share my passion with you and help inform people of the differences we could make. We can change building, growing, fuel, textiles, trash disposal, and so much more if we are informed enough to see the difference the changes could potentially make. I look forward to sharing and hopefully getting feedback to see what you think about the topics we can cover, and information that can be found.

To see an older presentation, I made you are welcome to click the link to see what tops I may cover. 

Go Green

Let's change how we use hemp!

  The world we live in is in trouble, without the changes necessary to reduce CO2 emissions and reduce greenhouse gases, I believe we will n...